Hannele said

We don’t know if Anne intended to show Tyndale’s book to Henry. She was forced to do it after the book she had loaned to her friend was stolen by her friend’s fiancee and Anne was thus in danger.

Further, one cannot draw the conclusion that “directly from this” came the Acts of Succession and Supremacy. Otherwise, Henry would have acted on his own after reading the book, but it took years of vain efforts until Cromwell with his brilliant abilities developed those Acts.

I’m reasonably sure Henry knew aout Tyndale’s book since it was on his orders it was banned. I doubt he had read it at that time . Either More or Wolsey possibly did and recommended it’s banning.
If Anne hadn’t shown it to Henry then some-one else who was high in Henry’s favour would have. I suspect that either Cramner but much more likely Cromwell may have been brave enough to show him ” The Obedience of a Christen man”.

Regarding the various Acts of Succession , what Henry wantd..it was for parliment to deliver….sooner or later..ONce a few notable exampls were made at the pointy end.

Henry was possibly the last truely autrocratic ruler of England. The regency council of Edward VI and the fact that the councillors thought that women couldn’t rule effectively steadily eroded the potlitical power of the throne.