7:12 pm
April 20, 2010
Sorry to keep asking questions….but the other post got me to thinking….
Do you guys really think that Henry loved Anne? What man will behead the woman he loves(d)? Seems beyond human capacity to do that…….Maybe he thought he loved her….you know it was all about love poems back then….I'm sure he sang her praises and she was a good companion and friend and advisor to him…but love? Nah……Not someone who would behead a woman after only being married to her for a few months….I don't care what his ambitions were…..
Not only did he behead her….but he married Jane the next day!! And then proceeded to marry 3 other women…..he mourned Jane more than he did Anne…..he could have sent Anne to a nunnery or have her agree to annull the marriage…I mean, she signed the paper hrs before her death to save her daughter's life..I'm sure she would have signed the same paper to save her own life…..if he loved her, he would have just divorced her like he did Katherine…..
IMO….
It is hard to understand Henry's psyche and why he did what he did, especially as he was a man living 500 years ago, but I am convinced that he loved Anne Boleyn. I don't know whether you have read the love letters that he wrote to her (there's a book of them) but they show clearly the depth of his love and passion. Also, Henry hated writing and yet he wrote all of those letters himself and when you compare them to the letter that he wrote Jane Seymour, which is very brief and to the point, you can see how much in love he was with Anne.
He pursued Anne for 6 or 7 years, bombarded her with letters and gifts, moved Heaven and Earth to possess her and that shows some depth of feeling. He was married to her for 3 years before her execution and their relationship has been described by Eric Ives as “storm followed sunshine, sunshine followed storm” and by G W Bernard as “sunshine and showers, showers and sunshine”. Both Ives and Bernard challenge the theory put forward by some (e.g. Weir) that the marriage was unhappy from the start because there are many examples of people writing how happy the couple were – both Ives and Bernard quote from sources. They had one of those volatile relationships where they would argue and then passionately make-up.
I realise I'm arguing for real love between them yet Henry stood by while Anne went to her death but there could be many reasons for this:-
- Love turned to hate – There is a thin line
- Anne was framed and Henry believed it
- Henry felt that he was acting in the best interests of the country by seeking to marry again for an heir
- He fell in love with Jane Seymour
- He believed that the marriage was cursed
- He had lost that passion for Anne, that thrill of new love and was looking for that feeling again
etc etc.
Personally, I don't think that Anne was the type of person to “go quietly” and I think Henry and his advisers knew that. She had to go and in a very final way. Even if she agreed to an annulmemt, she'd be there haunting Henry – perhaps Cromwell feared that Henry would be tempted to go back to Anne if he didn't get rid of her properly. It is so hard to say.
Anyway, I believe that Anne was the love of Henry's life.
Debunking the myths about Anne Boleyn
3:25 pm
August 12, 2009
There's also the point that if he 'merely' divorced/annulled his marriage to Anne, religious conservatives would consider that an impediment to his marrying again. And Henry wanted no questions about the legitimacy of this marriage and any heir(s) born to it. So, Anne had to die. I think he knew the charges were false, but she was in the way and had to go.
"Don't knock at death's door.
Ring the bell and run. He hates that."
7:52 pm
April 20, 2010
But, divorce was good enough for Katherine…as a matter of fact, he married Anne before the divorce 'went through' with Katherine….
Claire….I guess I see your points…I guess I'm using 21st century female logic to make sense of Henry and his actions…..
Love of his life? I dunno…..I guess I need to read that book of love letters….lol!
7:59 pm
June 20, 2009
I have the book of love letters. I think he did love her. He loved her with a passion he never had for his other wives.
Yes in our time, he could've divorced her and be done, but he did not want the issues he had with Katherine. He was so desperate for an heir, it clouded his judgement.
Let not my enemies sit as my jury
12:34 pm
February 24, 2010
I choke every time I say that Henry loved Anne, but I truly want to believe he felt something. I guess I would call it a magnificent obsession. A great passion if you will. I have read the love letters and I find them very romantic. Maybe Henry talked himself into believing he was in love with Anne, and he had to have her. Then he talked himself into believing he hated her, and had to get rid of her. His passion dissipated, and his obsession was placed elsewhere.
5:28 pm
March 12, 2010
I think Henry loved Anne with a passion that few people ever experience. Claire, I agree that there was probably a thin line between that sort of love and hate. I think that Cromwell saw it in the country's best political interest (and his best personal one) to get rid of Anne. Henry, as a king, apparently also saw the part about political interests. I think that Cromwell and the conservatives he worked with at this time pounced on the king's doubts about the politics of his marriage to Anne and convinced him that she was guilty of horrible things.
3:31 am
April 6, 2010
From all the things I have read of Henry and Anne's courtship, I think it might have been one of those “Endless Love” things – where he was obssessed with her, and had to have her at all costs, only to find, for whatever reasons he might have had, that the pursuit was where all the excitement was.
Here, he finally had her, after all those years of striving to get her into bed, and it wasn't a life changing experience after all. While a fascinating, intelligent, sexy woman, Anne WAS a woman, just like any other he had had.
The difference was her novelty – she dared say “no,” when he first proposed she become his official mistress.
LOL, can the rest of you imagine how rich a psychiatrist could have become, trying to help Henry through all of his “issues” with women? Marriage counselors would have had a field day! Not to mention, divorce lawyers might have bankrupted England, with regards to custody and inheritance rights for Mary and Elizabeth, as well as whatever alimony Katharine of Aragon and Anne would have been entitled to after putting up with all of his nonsense.
Despite what Alison Weir says about their marriage being unhappy from the start, evidence points to Anne and Henry being happy until right before her fall. They were often described as “merry” and there is no reason to think that their relationship cooled when they were actually married. I know that Henry took mistresses and this was a worry for Anne, but that was usual and was seen as a King's prerogative, it did not mean that he had tired of Anne, it was just something a man did. It's hard to know what happened towards the end of April 1536 and I am convinced that Jane Seymour would have been nothing but another notch (or not quite notch!) on Henry's bedpost if Anne had not fallen, I do not think that she was the cause.
Debunking the myths about Anne Boleyn
9:17 am
December 8, 2009
Nikki08 said:
What man will behead the woman he loves(d)? Seems beyond human capacity to do that……
Not only did he behead her….but he married Jane the next day!! And then proceeded to marry 3 other women…..he mourned Jane more than he did Anne…..he could have sent Anne to a nunnery or have her agree to annull the marriage…I mean, she signed the paper hrs before her death to save her daughter's life..I'm sure she would have signed the same paper to save her own life…..if he loved her, he would have just divorced her like he did Katherine…..
First up, in 16th century England the death penalty could be bestowed upon adulterous wives, the mandatory sentence being burning, just as men could beat their wives to within an inch of their lives, with impunity. I feel you are judging Henry by modern standards.
Henry and Anne were married for over three years, not a few months. The marriage got off to a pretty good start, and were very happy together. However, over time Henry's love for Anne died. Henry had torn apart the country so that he could marry her. Once the love began to die, Henry came to realise the full implications of what he had done. He had exposed his Kingdom to the threat of invasion, alienated his subjects and it dawned upon him that no one outside England regarded his daughter Elizabeth as a legitimate heir (ruling her out of the valuable marriage market).There were other things, too.
About the execution. Henry could not afford to repeat his last mistakes. Until January 1536, there were essentially two Queens in England. Katherine of Aragon and Anne Boleyn (with the vast majority of the country rooting for Katherine, a minority rooting for Anne). This was dividing the people of England and was a potential starting point for civil war (the thing Henry feared most). If Henry simply annulled his marraige to Anne, and Jane replaced her; there would once again be two Queens, dividing the nation and people questioning the legitimacy of the consort's issue. Henry could not take the risk, he desparately needed a male heir.
There were murmers of discontent over the rapidity with which Henry married Jane, following Anne's execution. Thats' perfectly understandable, however Henry was no longer a young man and he had no time to lose.
I'm certain that Henry did love Anne. I think he loved her passionately. It's just that, the love died and Henry's hatred of Anne matched his former love for her.
Henry marrying three other women and making as issue of it, is judging Henry with hindsight. Henry had no idea that he would marry several more times after Anne. He had no idea that Jane would die shortly after Edward's birth and if there was anything he could've done to prevent that, he would have.
Anne of Cleves was an arranged marraige, and no one could've prevented the disaster that that turned into.
Katherine Howard, well the least said about that, the better! There is no fool like an old fool, as they say.
Katherine Parr was finally a good marraige to a good woman.
Read up on the subject, and it all makes sense in the end.
Be daly prove you shalle me fynde,nTo be to you bothe lovyng and kynde,
1:48 pm
April 19, 2010
Claire said:Despite what Alison Weir says about their marriage being unhappy from the start, evidence points to Anne and Henry being happy until right before her fall. They were often described as “merry” and there is no reason to think that their relationship cooled when they were actually married. I know that Henry took mistresses and this was a worry for Anne, but that was usual and was seen as a King's prerogative, it did not mean that he had tired of Anne, it was just something a man did. It's hard to know what happened towards the end of April 1536 and I am convinced that Jane Seymour would have been nothing but another notch (or not quite notch!) on Henry's bedpost if Anne had not fallen, I do not think that she was the cause.
Well you have to be a bit cooler to your passionately beloved wife to tell her you could send her back down as quickly as you raised her. (But he actually used the same kindness towards Jane Seymour the only time she dared raise her voice upon a state matter). They were also arguing a lot.
Henry as a proof of love declared Anne he wouldnt be intimate with any other woman until they could get married, so why, if he still loved her so much, did he think a wife could be deceived where a lover could not? It was forbidden at the time for a husband to have relations with his wife while she was pregnant so he might have started seeing other women for that reason at first.
I dont think Jane Seymour would have been another notch, at least not until Anne's miscarriage, because if Anne had borne a son, it would have consecrated her as Queen and wife. Unlike most of his other affairs, he covered her with presents while she was “preserving her chastity” (did he not see she was just using what had worked for Anne?? Was he so silly??), with her family in the background keeping an eye on the good moral of their meetings. She was clearly asking for a marriage and a marriage only.
Anyelka said:
Well you have to be a bit cooler to your passionately beloved wife to tell her you could send her back down as quickly as you raised her. (But he actually used the same kindness towards Jane Seymour the only time she dared raise her voice upon a state matter). They were also arguing a lot.
Anyelka, I know that I have said many hurtful things to my husband in the heat of the moment and yet I love him with all my heart so I can imagine Henry lashing out at Anne like that and I don't think that we can read too much into that. When you are hurt or angry with a loved one you use words that will hurt, I think that's natural and I don't think that it means that his feelings were cooling and probably meant the opposite, you lash out like that at people you feel passionately about.
You're right, Anne and Henry argued a lot but we know that this was how their relationship was. As I said earlier, Ives described it as “storm followed sunshine, sunshine followed storm” and G W Bernard as “sunshine and showers, showers and sunshine”, and we all know people who have relationships like that. Both Anne and Henry were quick-tempered and passionate people who loved arguments and debates and who also loved making up. I can imagine a huge row followed by an equally passionate making up session.
As far as Jane was concerned, I think she was mentored well and knew how to play the game but I don't think Henry looked at her as a potential wife until Anne's arrest and I really don't think she was part of the reason why Anne fell.
Debunking the myths about Anne Boleyn
9:22 am
March 12, 2010
Claire, I agree. I don't think that Jane was the reason for Anne's downfall. Actually, I don't even believe that Henry hated Anne. I, too, imagine that Henry and Anne were both strong-willed and loved to debate and make up. I think Anne's fall stemmed from the fact that after being married to her for a few years, Henry began to see her as an ordinary person…but one for whom he had torn apart his country and caused many political problems. I think he made his mind up to do what he saw as the good of the kingdom and turned his head the other way while Cromwell did the dirty work. And, conveniently, a sweet, shy, conservative young virgin (or so she appeared) was suddenly available to Henry.
9:29 pm
April 20, 2010
Hannah,
I apologize…I mispoke….I meant to say a few yrs, and not a few months…I am aware that they married in 1533 and she was killed in 1536…..
As far as judging him using todays standards…..well, certainly today he can get a divorce for $195….lol….I was judging the severity of the punishment for someone he loved and was fully aware that she did not commit adultery…I don't buy that he thought she did….I think he was too arrogant at that time, to think a woman would…I think he thought HE could follow his wandering eye…
So having said that, I still think that beheading her was severe…even for those times…for a woman he loved and KNEW was being railroaded…..I suggested in another post that she join a nunnery….ok, I understand why that wasn't the best options, and you mentioned that….but I will propose another solution…..declare his marriage to Anne invalid because he was still married to Katherine and never obtained the annullment from the pope…that could have worked better than killing a nonadulterous wife for all of the reasons that everyone has stated…..see, most of the country was still catholic and would have honored the “original” pope dispensation, and declared Katherine the legal wife….well, since Katherine was now dead….Henry was free as a bird….more free than he was when Katherine was alive and he “married” Anne……
I am currently 'reading up on the subject', and I wonder if continuing to read various versions of the story with the same outcome will make the whole murder make more sense? Afterall…..I think that the reason a lot of people are sympathetic and interested in Anne is because of the unfair hand she was dealt in the end…..jmo…..
I could be wrong, of course…there have been a LOT of people defending(explaining) Henry's decision to have Anne killed….and I don't think one person has said that he was in the wrong..so maybe I'm wrong to think so negatively of him for his decision….
But the reasons you brought up…I dunno…I can't see Henry really caring about effect his decisions had on those entities you mentioned(other countries invading, others thinking that Elizabeth was illegititmate[remember, he still had Mary], etc)….but maybe the books I've read so far aren't doing HIM justice….I'll keep reading….
11:55 am
November 20, 2009
Hi All,
Well, there's a couple ways to look at how could he do this. If he did love her and felt betrayed, that could have lead him to wanting her dead out of revenge. Though since the executioner was already called long before the trial, he had his mind made up long before. Another thing to keep in mind is I don't think we were dealing with a completely mentally rational person at this point. There's some discussion that his leg injury was probably causing enough mental problems both chemically/fever, and lack of sleep induced paranoya. Lots of talk of how he was one person in the AM and another in the PM. That on top of the follow up injury that almost killed him focused his mind on his key mission in life, and true legitimate heir. As someone else pointed out, having two Queens caused lots of problems. What also would have been difficult as he learned with Catherine and Mary, was a second Queen and Pricess was even worse. He couldn't have Anne and Elizabeth plotting in Germany. Though I think Catherine and Mary posed a much bigger threat then Anne and Elizabeth would have. Catherine had the power of the Hapsburgs (sp?) and Rome on her side. Anne would have less foreign support. Might make for another intersting thread. 🙂
What was the question again? 😛 In short, I think he loved her at one point, but loved the Tudor legacy/England/himself more.
12:23 pm
February 24, 2010
Nikki08 said,
I am currently 'reading up on the subject', and I wonder if continuing to read various versions of the story with the same outcome will make the whole murder make more sense? Afterall…..I think that the reason a lot of people are sympathetic and interested in Anne is because of the unfair hand she was dealt in the end…..jmo…..
I could be wrong, of course…there have been a LOT of people defending(explaining) Henry's decision to have Anne killed….and I don't think one person has said that he was in the wrong..so maybe I'm wrong to think so negatively of him for his decision….
But the reasons you brought up…I dunno…I can't see Henry really caring about effect his decisions had on those entities you mentioned(other countries invading, others thinking that Elizabeth was illegititmate[remember, he still had Mary], etc)….but maybe the books I've read so far aren't doing HIM justice….I'll keep reading….
Nikki08….I have been reading about this for years and my feelings haven't changed one bit. I don't like Henry. Never did. The man was a murderer. However, I do try to understand what the hell he was thinking. I have yet to come up with a good reason why he did what he did.
He certainly had some kind of warm feeling for Anne. I still say it was an obsessive passion. I have a hard time understanding how someone who claims to love someone so deeply, can fall out of love so quickly. Before I married my husband, I fell in and out of love…I'll just say…often enough. I was so wrong. I was not in love at all. Passion, yes! Even one obsession! (both of which are fine, make me smile, memories) They were real, but they were definitely not love as I know it to be. Love IMHO lasts forever and only gets deeper as time goes on. It cannot die. You cannot kill it. If I were a Queen, I would never be able to kill my husband. (BTW, I am a Queen in my house… er…castle.)
So I can't get into believing that Henry TRULY loved Anne. He certainly can't prove it by me. If he had loved her, I mean truly loved her, I don't believe he would have ever let himself believe the false lies Cromwell used to bring his “beloved” down. He would never have approved the investigation. He wanted out! There is just no way a person who really, truly loves another person would ever have allowed any of those charges to come to light. He was King for heaven's sake. He could have shut the case down before it even began.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, Henry was a spoiled brat. I think he searched his whole life for love, and every time he had it within his grasp, he sabatogued it.
No sticking up for the guy here!
1:52 pm
August 12, 2009
Nikki, I think most of us believe Henry was wrong. We've just hashed it over so much it's assumed the readers know when they read your post that you think he was wrong, but are trying to figure out what in the world made him think and do the things he did. If you need me to say it specifically, I will. Henry was wrong. He murdered Anne, mistreated his daughters and was, IMO, an all-around psychopath. Or would that be a sociopath? Or both? I don't like the guy. Poor Anne. Others, too, but especially Anne.
"Don't knock at death's door.
Ring the bell and run. He hates that."
5:22 pm
December 8, 2009
As far as judging him using todays standards…..well, certainly today he can get a divorce for $195….lol….I was judging the severity of the punishment for someone he loved and was fully aware that she did not commit adultery…I don't buy that he thought she did….I think he was too arrogant at that time, to think a woman would…I think he thought HE could follow his wandering eye…
So having said that, I still think that beheading her was severe…even for those times…for a woman he loved and KNEW was being railroaded
But the reasons you brought up…I dunno…I can't see Henry really caring about effect his decisions had on those entities you mentioned(other countries invading, others thinking that Elizabeth was illegititmate
Beheading was regarded as merciful for the times, after all the mandatory sentence was burning. A much worse fate. Henry even went so far as to order an expert swordsman from France. Another merciful step. As I said earlier, adulterous wives could be executed.
As for whether Henry believed Anne was innocent. I am not too sure about that, we cannot say with certainty one way or the other. However, Henry spoke to his illegitimate son (Henry Fitzroy, Duke of Richmond) shortly before Anne's execution and broke down in tears. He said Anne had “had to do with over a hundred men, and that he (Fitzroy) and Mary had done well to escape Anne, as she planned to poison them”. This is in one of Chapuys letters, and shows that Henry believed in Anne's guilt.
Ofcourse Elizabeth's illegitimacy was a problem. If all other European monarchs refused to betroth their sons to her, it effectively removed Elizabeth from the lucrative marraige market, rendering another daughter useless. Marraiges were used to form international alliances, after all. You say Henry still had Mary, but that misses the point. Mary was regarded by all as being Henry's “legitimate” daughter, so she could be used in marital alliances if Henry had so desired. But Henry couldn't lose face like that, and Anne would have been furious.
Henry's greatest fears were foriegn invasion and civil war. So yes, that defiantely played a part in his actions. Ofcourse he cared about it and I find your disregard of it perplexing, to be honest. And Henry did risk a foriegn invasion, by the Emperor (Katherine of Aragon's nephew) amongst others.
As for Anne joining a nunnery, like I said. Two potential Queens dividing the nation is now what Henry wanted. He did annul the marraige, but we are not sure on what grounds.
Be daly prove you shalle me fynde,nTo be to you bothe lovyng and kynde,
10:16 pm
December 30, 2009
There is also the question of Henry losing face with his fellow monarchs and ambassadors. He had swept aside the Pope, a Spanish Princess, his daughter, several important counsellors – all to have Anne as his wife and to have a son.
When passion died and no son was forthcoming, he had to rid himself of her. How to do this without becoming a laughing stock? Well, as a “betrayed” king, whose wife was “a wh*re” with half his court, he could get rid of her permanently and would, perhaps, expect sympathy!
What is puzzling, if Henry still had some feeling for her and wished her well, was that their marriage was declared invalid before her execution. Therefore she had never been married to Henry and could not have committed adultery and therefore had not committed treason and therefore there was no need to execute her. But he still allowed her to die when the law under which she had been condemned did not apply because their marriage was not valid.
2:42 am
April 6, 2010
Jasmine, excellent post. One problem, however. While your reasoning is sound, that thanks to the annullment prior to her execution, Anne was never truly Henry's wife, and could not have been an adulterer.
The problem here is your argument is rational, and I don't think Henry had any idea what “reason,” “reasonable,” “logical,” “sound,” or “rational” meant at this point.
It's very possible, thanks to his fall from the horse in that joust, where he was unconscious for something like two hours, that Henry suffered a traumatic brain injury, and as a result, his personality shifted, radically.