8:59 pm
May 7, 2010
When Weston, Brereton, Norris and George were taken were they imprisoned together or would they have had separate cells or something? I am guessing Mark would be in dungeons as he was thought ‘beneath’ the others. Also I know George was taken the same day as Anne and Norris the day before when were the rest taken?
I should know all this but can’t bring it to mind so thanks for any pointers.
Let us show them that they are hares and foxes trying to rule over dogs and wolves - Boudica addressing the tribes Circa AD60
10:51 pm
January 3, 2012
George would have certainly had his own cell, as befitting his status. I also think Henry Norris would of too as he was a Sir. They also would have had the benefit ( if you could call it that) of having one or 2 servents to do what needed doing, and of course would have had decent food, wine and wood etc. They were also allowed to have visitors too. Weston and Brereton were perhaps imprisoned in the same cell or maybe side by side with just a steel divider, between them. They would have had food brought to them by their jailor and it was perhaps a small plate of meat and chunk of bread, with maybe a bit of fruit, with what was called a small beer to drink. Poor old Mark would have definetly been down in the dungeon and perhaps housed fairly close to the torture chamber. Mark I’m afraid would have to make do with table scraps for food, and maybe again a small beer to drink. We know that Mark was tortured to get a confession, and perhaps the reason they may have kept him close to the torture chamber was to make sure he didn’t retract it. In those days simply showing the prisoner the instruments of torture was enough to get them to say anything just so they wouldn’t be hurt.
I love the euthamisum, that James 1st (6th of Scotland) used when Guy Fawkes was caught, he said “We must find out who else was involved in this attempt on my life, We must put Fawkes to the question” In short he was saying torture him to get the truth.
Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod
3:09 am
May 16, 2011
3:23 am
November 18, 2010
11:20 am
January 3, 2012
Anyanka said
IIRC, the men were all kept in honourable confinement, even Smeaton since he had sufficent funds to pay for it. I need to look up the cites though…
Thank Anyanka.. I wasn’t too sure about Mark’s confinement, but it would have made sence that he would have been kept in a dungeon somewhere as he wasn’t landed gentry, only a good servant and a gifted musician. However as you have pointed out that wasn’t the case.
Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod
11:37 am
May 7, 2010
Thank you for that information.
So Mark would have had enough funds to pay for his keep as it were in the tower. I thought he was a mere lowly servant but then again I suppose as a good musician he would have earned money.
Let us show them that they are hares and foxes trying to rule over dogs and wolves - Boudica addressing the tribes Circa AD60
4:56 pm
January 3, 2012
Maggyann said
Thank you for that information.
So Mark would have had enough funds to pay for his keep as it were in the tower. I thought he was a mere lowly servant but then again I suppose as a good musician he would have earned money.
I’m not to sure about this but I think Anne wanted Mark to be Elizabeth’s first music tutor, so therefore he must have been quite highly thought of. I think when he first came to court, he was perhaps viewed as so many other musicians were viewed ok can play a lute and sing a bit, but he must have had that certain something that made him stand out from all the other musicians.
Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod
5:36 pm
April 11, 2011
Don’t know about being Elizabeth’s music tutor but he was highly thought of as a musician. He started out as a boy chorister for Wolsey, so was already mixing in high circles for a person of low standing, could play multiple instruments and earned at least £100 a year. Many thought he had ideas above his station and were envious of his perceived closeness to Anne, so when the situation arose he made an easy and covenient pawn for Henry’s accusations.
8:22 pm
January 3, 2012
Neil Kemp said
Don’t know about being Elizabeth’s music tutor but he was highly thought of as a musician. He started out as a boy chorister for Wolsey, so was already mixing in high circles for a person of low standing, could play multiple instruments and earned at least £100 a year. Many thought he had ideas above his station and were envious of his perceived closeness to Anne, so when the situation arose he made an easy and covenient pawn for Henry’s accusations.
Wherever there is an obvious talent there is bound to be jealously,and I’m afraid that it was poor old Mark who got the thin edge of the wedge.
Many people in the Tudor times and before came from humble origins. The Boleyn Family were after all just mercers, who by careful skill and dilligence in what they did worked their way up the social ladder, and I dare say that when Anne was just a twinkle in some cloth cutters eye, there were people who were jealous of the Boleyn’s etc it is always the same, even today you will find that. Certainly around here you do anyway.
Jealously is one emotion I simply don’t understand, basically because I don’t process it. If a person has worked hard all their lives and managed to buy a big house etc, out of what they earned. good for them, they deserve it. But for others it’s a case of this isn’t fair why should they be able to have new things etc.. It’s madness.. Like I said in a previous posting about which wife do you most think you are like? My answer is AOC, happy with my lot and very grateful and humble with it.
Anne liked good music and Mark was lucky enough to process the talant for Anne to enjoy what he played and sung.
Mark like Weston, Norris and Brereton, were scapegoats, used to 1. get rid of Anne and 2. perhaps to get rid of rivals to control old Stinky.
After Weston, Norris and Brereton were Stinky’s freinds before he met Anne, Stinky possibly was aware of Mark’s talants but didn’t encourage him to better himself, so in that respect Anne wanted him to make the most of his talant and gave him the oppotunity to do that.
I believe that it is entirely possible that he would have ended up teaching Elizabeth music, and of course if Anne had lived and produced other children, Mark would have been a very well know musician and teacher and also taught those children too and would have gone to his grave naturally, a very rich man, with perhaps an a knighthood or even an earldom and a good marriage under his belt to boot too.
Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod
1:48 am
November 18, 2010