The above link states (should it ever disappear):
Detail of a late twentieth-century portrait of Anne Boleyn, second wife of Henry VIII. The portrait, which is less than eighteen years old, was specifically made for Castle Lodge, a superb building in the heart of Ludlow, Shropshire. The building dates back to the thirteenth-century though much has been altered since. Today mostly the sixteenth and seventeenth century alterations remain. A series of portraits of prominent Tudor figures, namely Henry VIII’s wives, were made to furnish the house after it was purchased by Mr and Mrs Pearson around eighteen years ago. They were painted by a local artist who, I was told, has since gone on to be well known. I was told by the lovely couple who own the house that the lodgings were originally part of nearby Ludlow Castle though the fortifications attached to the lodgings were destroyed during the Civil War. Cannon balls fired at the lodgings by the parliamentarians can still be found in parts of the walls. The building, which is currently up for sale, has been used for several period dramas, and continues to be open to the public.
3:10 pm
November 21, 2013
1:22 am
November 18, 2010
Georgina said
I am not sure if it has already been said but the Ludlow painting of Anne Boleyn was only about eighteen years old, according to a website I was on
could you provide a link please??
Anne was almost certainly still in France when she was 18, which would make a portrait of her a strange occurance.
It's always bunnies.
11:28 pm
January 9, 2010
1:02 am
November 18, 2010
5:25 am
January 9, 2010
Anyanka said
I shall sit in a corner and learn to read..
LOL
Actually I’ve been to the Castle Lodge in Ludlow about 16 years ago. I saw the full length portrait of Catherine Parr, a copy of the original that would have been done at the same time as the AB one. That is, about two years previously. I never did see the one of Anne though. If I remember correctly the Catherine Parr one at the lodge was still identified as Lady Jane Grey as it was only a couple of months before that that the original had been re-identified as CP.
6:02 am
May 29, 2014
The Portrait of Ludlow is very nice and is captured well on basis of simplicity.
12:45 pm
January 3, 2012
Impish_Impulse said
Belle said:
I found another portrait of Anne I don’t know how accurate it is, but I thought I would share it.For some reason I’m having problems posting it here, so I’ll just past the url.
It looks Victorian to me. The face doesn’t look much like her other portraits and her hair is curly! But I thought the headpiece she’s wearing was very interesting – it’s like a gable hood/French hood hybrid. Too rounded to be a ‘traditional’ gable hood, but too squared to be a ‘traditional’ French hood, either. Is it a transitional style, or did the later times just get it wrong?
I have to agree, this is a typical sort of Victorian picture. It has the look of a woman, who is scared and rather weak looking, in my opinion.
Anne.B was certainly no weakling. My favorite portrait of Anne is the John Hoskins portrait. It’s far less busy than Holbiens portrait. Hoskins portrait shows a woman of courage and nerve, which Anne most certainly had in abundance, but it also shows a fresh faced pretty young woman, who resembles her sister, and in the Hoskins portrait I can also see the spark that was uniquely Anne.
Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod
6:06 pm
February 24, 2010
Boleyn said
Impish_Impulse said
Belle said:
I found another portrait of Anne I don’t know how accurate it is, but I thought I would share it.For some reason I’m having problems posting it here, so I’ll just past the url.
It looks Victorian to me. The face doesn’t look much like her other portraits and her hair is curly! But I thought the headpiece she’s wearing was very interesting – it’s like a gable hood/French hood hybrid. Too rounded to be a ‘traditional’ gable hood, but too squared to be a ‘traditional’ French hood, either. Is it a transitional style, or did the later times just get it wrong?
I have to agree, this is a typical sort of Victorian picture. It has the look of a woman, who is scared and rather weak looking, in my opinion.
Anne.B was certainly no weakling. My favorite portrait of Anne is the John Hoskins portrait. It’s far less busy than Holbiens portrait. Hoskins portrait shows a woman of courage and nerve, which Anne most certainly had in abundance, but it also shows a fresh faced pretty young woman, who resembles her sister, and in the Hoskins portrait I can also see the spark that was uniquely Anne.
Well that portrait is just awful. I’m not overly fond of Victorian portraits of women. They always look to me as if they are begging for something or they are about to cry.
10:48 pm
starbug said
Looking at some art websites, it appears that the inscription ‘Etatis sue’ means the the age of the sitter when their portrait was taken. The inscription appears in some of Holbein’s portraits, as described in this article: http://www.artdaily.com/index……_new=32594
So, ‘Etatis sue 31’ implies that Anne was 31 years old in the Ludlow portrait, which fits in with the theory that Anne was born in 1501 and was 35 at her death.
Hello everyone, by the way. I’ve just discovered this forum. I’ve loved Anne Boleyn for many years and I look forward to posting here often.
Actually aetatis sua 31 means in the 31st year of her age -so she was 30. Personally I think this is a completely modern picture – i.e done in the last 100 years, probably in the last 50. I don’t know why I think that, I just have the feeling.