Satan is a Christian concept. Satan doesn't exist in Paganism. He was used as a form of conversion from Paganism to Christianity – hence why he looks like Pan, Cernunnos etc. Pagan simply means a polytheistic religion – those who worship more than one God/Goddess.

Conspiracies may have some truth, but use your intelligence… and slightly better grammar, so you don't come across a little bit simple.

The government need us, not the other way around – Although they like us to think otherwise.

Well said Bella, I read the original post by Capraquarious and thought it must be April 1st. Is this for real?

Okay…I think I only got half of what was being said in the first posting…wow….strange.

Talk about mad…erm…creative…messages!

Curses, I knew I should have paid more attention to Dr Who, Star Trek and Blake's Seven when I was younger, then it would all have made sense! Anyanka, any tin-foil hats going spare please?

capraquarious said:

ok people firstly this is to Elliemarianna

sorry for the grammar but i have keys missing from my key board hence the bad grammar but also know this in high school i won an award out of 1400 school kids for the best presented history book so slow down on your judgement there

secondly you say satan is a christian concept and doesnt exist in paganism satan has gone by many names throughout history it is still the same evil,id like to go into more detail but for now ill leave it at that with respect

secondly to Bella44 be patient and in time i will show you things which need questioning and researching so slow down on your critisism and be patient please

thirdly to nutmeg again be patient 

to Claire it would have been better to say not that they dont exist but where can i see what i obviously havent,again be patient

 

to Elliemarianna in reply to your second post i admire how you say I believe that gibberish nonsence of david icke and alex jones and that im a follower of them,im sorry my child i follow no man but god your first reply i had respect for but your second is something which shows your true judgemental mentallity without facts be patient

neil kemp,meg c,anyanka you are fools who judge things you obviously know nothing or little about and only a fool would judge like that

now if this was a court of law and i stand accoused with my evidence and the accuser had nothing but slanderless language whos side would the judge take?

so before slandering who and what you dont know try to refrain from it instead of looking just as stupid if stupid you think i am

this is not a 2 minute topic for it contains to much info to RESEARCH,thats right people im giving you the other side to the stories for you to judge YOURSELVES but if you are happy to believe there is only 1 side to every arguement then stop reading but if you like to JUDGE for yourself by hearing the OTHER side then carry on please and ill give you food for thought

i am not going to write a dozen or more things to look and judge because the chances are only a few questions will be answered on a few topics and the rest will get swept under the carpet so ill play this different

for now

what im about to say will have to be proved to be wrong before it can be said its wrong so ill give you 1 side and leave it to those who are quick to judge and critisise to give you the other side OR to prove me wrong no hearsay only facts,back up what you say or step aside out my way

 

knights templars are said to be christians yet they waged war upon mankind and said there work was in gods name but anyone who reads the bible knows this is complete nonsense as no war of this world is gods war only man with bad intentions say that to mislead those of faith and those without 

they later became known as freemasons then illuminati

i say this there is more evidence (infact untold amount)to say that its a cult who worship satan and his fallen angels,the zodiac gods,they even hold rituals ect exactly the sme way as those in egypt 

NOW

if you think they had nothing to do with satanism and black magic i would like to see your EVIDENCE to say otherwise then ill produce mine and only then

remember the queen is its highest member and all royalty past and present are also members so be carefull how you answer because if you dont or cant then you have just put a HUGE question mark over many many things which will be revealed in time

one last thing to think about

years ago royalty burnt witches ect at the stake and alot of the evidence used to get a conviction was absolute flimbsy but if we are to believe by royalty that it was enough then gather the wood prepare the stake for the evidence to convict royalty is far,far,far greater if we judge by there standards

i left a little something out from my first post about gayness in royalty 

if you read the works of aleister crowley he and others like him have said to reach a certain height in this blackmagic nonsense man must sleep with another man for his mind ect to open further and if he does not he will not progress further so now you know why various royal members and there followers are gay or have had gay sex

i will say no more untill i am proved wrong on this very first and very important first point “why are royalty dwelling on and practising nonsense to do with this evil society

bye for now CAPRAQUARIOUS

I am a pagan and I find you offensive. I don't believe in Satan and he has no place in any part of my religion. Who is the wiccan version of Satan? I think you will find there isn't one.

There is nothing wrong with being gay either, you love who you love.

You are saying these things without actually enlightening us to what they have supposedly done… I'd like to see these controversial paintings of Anne you speak of?

Don't know what this odd post is about but all I can say is that I much prefer posts about what the forum is about.

Iam a Royalist and proud of it and I find this post direspectful to PAST and present members of the Royal family, Anne Boleyn was  a crowned Queen of England and a member of our British Royal family so PLEASE remember when posting.

Oh, geez, where to begin?  I can't even believe I'm letting myself to get roped into responding to this.

First off, it is abundantly clear to me that you knew exactly what type of website this was before you ever posted a single word, thus the ONLY point of your post was to illicit this exact type of response.  And since that's clearly what you wanted, then I think you're getting what you asked for.   

Never having heard of either David Icke or Alex Jones, I took a few minutes to Google them.  For every website Mr. Icke has created or endorsed, there are fifty that discredit him, and Alex Jones's website is distinctly lacking in any kind of his more inflamatory material.  Assuming, of course, that I picked the correct Alex Jones–it's an insanely common name.  At any rate, an absence of the material doesn't mean it doesn't exist, just means I didn't find it in a 10-minute search.  Seems that Mr. Icke's ideas are MUCH more out-there, and it seems he could have really used the help of the child psychologist his doctor recommended he see when he was a child.

Unless you are entirely delusional, you HAD to realize that your comments would be met with jabs and snide remarks.  If you can't handle that then perhaps you should refrain from posting other such comments.  To go against the flow of conventional beliefs requires a thicker skin than that.  

what im about to say will have to be proved to be wrong before it can be said its wrong so ill give you 1 side and leave it to those who are quick to judge and critisise to give you the other side OR to prove me wrong no hearsay only facts,back up what you say or step aside out my way

 First, this paragraph makes no sense, partially because it's a massive run-on sentence, and partially because it has no logic to it.  “what im about to say will have to be proved to be wrong before it can be said its wrong…”?  Yeah, that's typically the definition of something being wrong.  Aside from throwing out some random thoughts, you haven't offered any kind of evidence to support anything you say.  For all I know, you're completely pulling this out of your ass.  How about you link to some journal articles or some research that's being done?  Or provide something?  What is the basis of your ideas?  It has to be built on something, and right now you're talking about everything from the Knights Templar to Satan to the Rockefellers to Princess Diana and Jack the Ripper.  You haven't demonstrated any kind of logical thread here and it all sounds like gibberish to me.  How about you scale it back and focus on what this is supposed to mean to the members of the Anne Boleyn Files because right now it reads like the worst teenage research papers I've ever read.  No flow, no logic, and no sources.  If I were an English teacher, I'd be crying.  

remember the queen is its highest member and all royalty past and present are also members so be carefull how you answer because if you dont or cant then you have just put a HUGE question mark over many many things which will be revealed in time

 The Queen is the highest member of what?  The Illuminati?  I'm sorry, you lost me.  Your last reference to a group for the Queen to be the highest member of was, like 3 paragraphs before this so I have no idea what group you're talking about.  Aside from that, you have yet to exhibit any kind of evidence for the existence for an Illuminati to begin with, but you feel that we should just take your word for it apparently?  Pray tell, why would I do that?  Because you apparently are privy to all these secrets and NO ONE else is?  I think South Park did an episode about something like this once.   

i will say no more untill i am proved wrong on this very first and very important first point “why are royalty dwelling on and practising nonsense to do with this evil society

 Again I reiterate, you have yet to either a) bring forth any kind of evidence of this “evil society” or b) assuming you can find convincing evidence, establish that the Royals have anything to do with said society.  So, since you haven't done that and you said you would say no more until you could be proved wrong (and being unable to prove you wrong is not the same as proving you right), then I expect you will remain silent for a great while.

capraquarious said:

 

 

  i will say no more untill i am proved wrong on this very first and very important first point “why are royalty dwelling on and practising nonsense to do with this evil society

 

We can live in hope…..