11:27 am
May 16, 2011
Yesterday I was reading 'To Die for' by Sandra Byrd (which I finished the whole book within hours, yay!) and there was a part where Meg Wyatt, Anne's best friend, questioned how Anne could even trust Henry:
'As he and a small band of attendants pulled away in Hampton court, I asked Anne, “Does it trouble you that Henry seems to show so little loyalty?” I was thinking of Wolsey, of course, but also Mary Boleyn and Henry's own children by her, of Henry's lawful daughter, Mary, and even the Queen. She may of come to him under false pretense but she had served him well.'
It made me think the same question Meg had asked Anne. I mean, Henry never really proved himself loyal to anybody- Like with Thomas More, he had been so close with him and if he could put More to death then why should anybody be confident in being safe, especially around Henry?
And then Anne, we all know how in love Henry was with her. He was obsessed, then that great love turned into a 10 times worse great hate. It's like his was never really truthful to anyone, ever.
• Grumble all you like, this is how it’s going to be.
2:01 pm
February 24, 2010
During the time that Wolsey, More and Fisher, and KOA were being destroyed, Henry was telling Anne that he would do whatever it took to have her for his wife. She was in love with him and she believed in him. Anne believed in his loyalty to her. Her hopes and dreams were built upon Henry's promises. What happened to those people could not happen to her. He would protect her. Meg was on the outside looking in. She was a dear friend, but who listens to friends when they are in love?
“To Die For,” was such a good story, wasn't it? I read it in a matter of hours. Great insight.
8:24 pm
May 16, 2011
It was such a good book, I couldn't put it down so i just decided to finish it and I did within, about, 9 hours. Then I found myself sad that I rushed through it and couldn't read anymore. Now i'm reading Threads by Nell Gavin which i've found to be a waaay different story then To die for, but i'll read just about anything.
Anywhoo, I kind of understand what your saying about Anne & Henry – i've heard the term 'blinded love' before and this reminds me of it. But when More, Fisher, & KOA were ultimately betrayed (More & Fisher dead, Katherine abandonded, & Wolsey dead) didn't Anne ever think that maybe Henry would do the same to her? And that is the way it ended, she died like the others. I'm sure it did cross her mind maybe seriously or just a mild thought, I can imagine how fearful it would be for her. Scary & dangerous stuff, eh?
• Grumble all you like, this is how it’s going to be.
10:39 am
June 7, 2010
Anne was in love with Henry. I doubt she harboured any idea that her marriage to Henry would end badly. More, Wolsey, and KOA were on the outs, and since they did not serve Anne's interests, they were not her concern. She believed in her ability to give Henry son and all would be well. She had Henry's protection, support, and determination to make her Queen. There's no way she could have imagined she would not remain the most important person in Henry's life. Henry's betrayl of Anne's trust at the end must have cut deep. Ultimatley, Anne put her trust in someone with a poor track record, but like many people, she wanted to believe in the best of him. Sadly, in the end, Anne became just another of Henry's victims.
I keep hearing such wonderful things about Sandra Byrd's book. I must see if I can track down a copy.
"By daily proof you shall find me to be to you both loving and kind" Anne Boleyn
11:05 am
February 24, 2010
She had put so much trust in Henry. I don't believe it would have occurred to her that he could do to her what he did to the others. Wolsey, More, Fisher and KOA went against their king's wishes. She didn't. Why would he turn against her, right? By the time she did realize that Henry would get rid of her as well, it was too late for her. The sense of betrayal must have been awful for her.
“Threads,” is a favorite of mine. Hope you enjoy it. It's is very different than “To Die For,” but well worth reading.
11:30 am
June 7, 2011
“It is foretold in ancient prophesies that at this time a Queen shall be burnt. But even if I were to suffer a thousand deaths, my love for you would not abate one jot.”
I think she knew Henry would be the reason she would die, hence the comment is directed at him. Anne was telling him even if he killed her a thousand times, she would still love him just as much. Anne was obviously still shocked when it actually happened though…
"It is however but Justice, & my Duty to declre that this amiable Woman was entirely innocent of the Crimes with which she was accused, of which her Beauty, her Elegance, & her Sprightliness were sufficient proofs..." Jane Austen.
2:55 pm
November 18, 2010
Sharon said:
She had put so much trust in Henry. I don't believe it would have occurred to her that he could do to her what he did to the others. Wolsey, More, Fisher and KOA went against their king's wishes. She didn't. Why would he turn against her, right? By the time she did realize that Henry would get rid of her as well, it was too late for her. The sense of betrayal must have been awful for her.
“Threads,” is a favorite of mine. Hope you enjoy it. It's is very different than “To Die For,” but well worth reading.
Exactly, why wouldn't she trust him?
The Boleyns had raised themselves to the king's notice firstly by the efforts of Thomas as a dipolmat and latterly as Mary became his mistress. To Anne, Henry was the fount of power. He got what he wanted and Anne was protected by him.
Like many men in love he promised Anne everything. That he took it all away and in such a short time in comparision to his other victims must come as a huge shock. She had no warning and no chance to fight back. Her discovery that Henry was prepared to kill her by legal process and destroy her reputation totally was beyond comprehension.
I haven't got To Die For yet, though it's on the current wishlist. I just started Threads but am finding it a bit hard going ATM. Too many family members around to read properly.
It's always bunnies.
Mya Elise said
Yesterday I was reading ‘To Die for’ by Sandra Byrd (which I finished the whole book within hours, yay!) and there was a part where Meg Wyatt, Anne’s best friend, questioned how Anne could even trust Henry:
‘As he and a small band of attendants pulled away in Hampton court, I asked Anne, “Does it trouble you that Henry seems to show so little loyalty?” I was thinking of Wolsey, of course, but also Mary Boleyn and Henry’s own children by her, of Henry’s lawful daughter, Mary, and even the Queen. She may of come to him under false pretense but she had served him well.’
It made me think the same question Meg had asked Anne. I mean, Henry never really proved himself loyal to anybody- Like with Thomas More, he had been so close with him and if he could put More to death then why should anybody be confident in being safe, especially around Henry?
And then Anne, we all know how in love Henry was with her. He was obsessed, then that great love turned into a 10 times worse great hate. It’s like his was never really truthful to anyone, ever.
I wondered if Anne thought that by her becoming queen, she would share in Hank’s immunity to arrest or trial, if anything should go wrong after the marriage… that she would be ‘safe’.
Anne-fan said
Mya Elise said
Yesterday I was reading ‘To Die for’ by Sandra Byrd (which I finished the whole book within hours, yay!) and there was a part where Meg Wyatt, Anne’s best friend, questioned how Anne could even trust Henry:
‘As he and a small band of attendants pulled away in Hampton court, I asked Anne, “Does it trouble you that Henry seems to show so little loyalty?” I was thinking of Wolsey, of course, but also Mary Boleyn and Henry’s own children by her, of Henry’s lawful daughter, Mary, and even the Queen. She may of come to him under false pretense but she had served him well.’
It made me think the same question Meg had asked Anne. I mean, Henry never really proved himself loyal to anybody- Like with Thomas More, he had been so close with him and if he could put More to death then why should anybody be confident in being safe, especially around Henry?
And then Anne, we all know how in love Henry was with her. He was obsessed, then that great love turned into a 10 times worse great hate. It’s like his was never really truthful to anyone, ever.
I wondered if Anne thought that by her becoming queen, she would share in Hank’s immunity to arrest or trial, if anything should go wrong after the marriage… that she would be ‘safe’.
Well, yeah I understand that but still she saw the Henry treated Katherine even before he got interested in her, and my whole question was I wonder if Anne ever wondered whether he’d treat her the same way? If he could do that to Katherine then why wouldn’t he do the same exact thing to Anne? I know Anne probably thought since he told he he loved her more than anything that nothing bad would happen and since he loved her so much then why would he ever fall out of love with her?
I don’t think that’s anything anybody thinks about when they start a relationship, whether if one day everything will turn around on you and that same person who once adored you is now the one after you.
• Grumble all you like, this is how it’s going to be.
8:49 am
February 24, 2010
Mya,
She must have thought about the fact that when Henry was angry with someone, it didn’t bode well for them. Deep down she must have had doubts. However, I think she would have pushed those doubts to the back of her mind. Sort of Scarlett O’Hara like, “I’ll think about that tomorrow.” He told her he loved her above all others and she bought into it. Anne chose to love Henry and believe he would always love her.
9:07 am
March 28, 2012
We don’t know if Anne bought into it or not. Anne wasn’t blind to Henry’s shortcomings. She would have been aware of her danger. She chose the best option, and I think that she knew too how it could possibly end. She was a courtier who became a queen, even though she made the transition disastrously!
I think that just makes her all the more brave then. I mean she saw the way Henry was but yet because she loved him and thought he loved her so she continued into it even though she knew it probably wasn’t the safest thing to do. I think in their situation the term ‘love is blind’ sumed it up almost perfectly.
Remember that scene in ‘The Tudors’ when Henry & Anne go away together and at the same time Henry sends Katherine away for good? And they are at their little house thing and the man comes in with a message from the Queen asking after Henry’s health and Henry beats the crap out of him? Then Anne quickly changes the subject saying ‘everything is beautiful’ and you can visibly see the fear in her eyes?
I think that scene probably happend alot in reality….
• Grumble all you like, this is how it’s going to be.
9:32 am
March 28, 2012
Oh yes Mya Elise, Anne could see the tiger in Henry. But when you’re caged together with him, it’s a good thing to have a needle and a tranquilliser. And it was also clear to Anne that Henry was a changeable person. Not someone to tame, but someone to control. In the end, things got so crazy that Anne lost that control and ended up in the tower. A choice she made, a risk she took.. And faced the consequences of a lost gamble. If one were to suggest that she accepted death in return for a swipe at freedom for the English (freedom from the tyranny of Rome and clergy like Wolsey)… I think that Anne was clearly conscious of what was at stake, but she chose to run it anyway.
Maybe your right, Anne probably did know what was at stake in that dangerous situation but I don’t think she thought she’d ever have to die from it. She and Henry both believed that once they were married they’d have a prince and everything but be fine from there but I don’t think they ever considered that a having a girl would be a possible outcome.
• Grumble all you like, this is how it’s going to be.
1:24 pm
April 2, 2012
Hello all, I’m, a new member to the forum. I think Anne’s actions are illustrated by the quote below. I have no record of who wrote it or when it was written. I saved it many years ago and I think it fits her perfectly. Once she chose the course of her life, she could only stay the course, she knew of no other way, come what may. With Henry or because of Henry or whithout Henry.
“Your true character is revealed by the clarity of your convictions, the choices you make, and the promises you keep. Hold strongly to your principles and refuse to follow the currents of convenience. What you say and do defines who you are, and who you are…you are forever.”
2:20 pm
January 3, 2012
NanBoleyn said
Hello all, I’m, a new member to the forum. I think Anne’s actions are illustrated by the quote below. I have no record of who wrote it or when it was written. I saved it many years ago and I think it fits her perfectly. Once she chose the course of her life, she could only stay the course, she knew of no other way, come what may. With Henry or because of Henry or whithout Henry.
“Your true character is revealed by the clarity of your convictions, the choices you make, and the promises you keep. Hold strongly to your principles and refuse to follow the currents of convenience. What you say and do defines who you are, and who you are…you are forever.”
Nan. Welcome to our happy home firstly.
Secondly Your quoted saying comes from a lady called Karen Todd who is a motivational speaker in the USA.
Semper Fidelis, quod sum quod
NanBoleyn, I think the quote is quite close to Anne’s character. The quote is basically talking about a strong person who stays true to themselves which was Anne. By not addressing her charges on her execution day basically told the world that the charges weren’t true and it wasn’t even worth getting mad about because SHE knew she was innocent and most of all she wanted to die peacefully and bringing up the lies about her would just make her upset. The only thing that matters it that she knew she was innocent and we know she is and everyone you thinks differently can suck it….LOL too harsh?
• Grumble all you like, this is how it’s going to be.
Mya Elise said
Anne-fan said
Mya Elise said
Yesterday I was reading ‘To Die for’ by Sandra Byrd (which I finished the whole book within hours, yay!) and there was a part where Meg Wyatt, Anne’s best friend, questioned how Anne could even trust Henry:
‘As he and a small band of attendants pulled away in Hampton court, I asked Anne, “Does it trouble you that Henry seems to show so little loyalty?” I was thinking of Wolsey, of course, but also Mary Boleyn and Henry’s own children by her, of Henry’s lawful daughter, Mary, and even the Queen. She may of come to him under false pretense but she had served him well.’
It made me think the same question Meg had asked Anne. I mean, Henry never really proved himself loyal to anybody- Like with Thomas More, he had been so close with him and if he could put More to death then why should anybody be confident in being safe, especially around Henry?
And then Anne, we all know how in love Henry was with her. He was obsessed, then that great love turned into a 10 times worse great hate. It’s like his was never really truthful to anyone, ever.
I wondered if Anne thought that by her becoming queen, she would share in Hank’s immunity to arrest or trial, if anything should go wrong after the marriage… that she would be ‘safe’.
Well, yeah I understand that but still she saw the Henry treated Katherine even before he got interested in her, and my whole question was I wonder if Anne ever wondered whether he’d treat her the same way? If he could do that to Katherine then why wouldn’t he do the same exact thing to Anne? I know Anne probably thought since he told he he loved her more than anything that nothing bad would happen and since he loved her so much then why would he ever fall out of love with her?
I don’t think that’s anything anybody thinks about when they start a relationship, whether if one day everything will turn around on you and that same person who once adored you is now the one after you.
Good point there… after all, if he would dump one, he’d have no guilty conscience in dumping another.
3:46 am
March 28, 2012
Henry was angry at Anne for having ‘lied’ to him over the baby. And for conjuring up a cloud of cotton dreams with her ‘promises’ which she couldn’t make happen. And Crommie probably fed Henry with insinuations borne on the grapevine. But Anne was clear about where it was all possibly going, and she accepted that turn of fate. In any way to make amendments for whatever wrong she did, Anne was prepared to face her fate. But Destiny has the last word, especially in her case. Anne died crownless, but she is remembered today by a great number of people. Which is more than what many got.
7:08 am
May 7, 2010
I think it has to be remembered that marrying for love was a practically unheard of concept in the 1500s. Anne had already almost ended up married to a distant relative to be dumped in Ireland, a wild and uncouth land at the time. Then she had thought she may have a chance with Percy the wimp who although he was based in the wild North of England at least had the fact he did attend at court on occasion in his favour so a step up definitely from the depths of Ireland. Then she has the chance of staying in England, not just in England but at the centre of the court. There may well have been passion but a chaste woman of her age would probably be well on the way to feeling passionate about anything in trousers.
Anne was raised, as were all well brought up females of the time, to know that she would be expected to marry to the benefit of her family and to bear children for the comfort of her own old age, anything else in the stakes of personal likes or comfort would be a bonus. Falling for the King would have been an easy choice for her if marriage were on offer which it obviously was. Trusting didn’t really come into it I would have thought. A good marriage was the main aim. Women were discarded all over the place e.g. Norfolk and his laundry maid or whatever she was. So the fact Henry could discard his wife and mistress would not really have rang any major alarm bells in Anne’s mind. Men discarded wives and took mistresses that was a fact of life. There was no reason to trust as such, a woman really just had to hope for the best when going into a marriage.
Anne was a strong minded woman who could see the pros and cons of the situation. I don’t think she was easily deceived about anything. She weighed it all up and decided it was worth the wager. She then went for it determined to do her best with what life brought her.
Let us show them that they are hares and foxes trying to rule over dogs and wolves - Boudica addressing the tribes Circa AD60