I don’t know whether you want to work through the discussion questions from the publisher. I’ve put them below. I was interested in the fact that the novel made me empathise with Cromwell, and also Wolsey at the start, but made me hate Thomas More, he was so cruel to his daughter with the peas in the box trick.
Here are the discussion questions:-
Debunking the myths about Anne Boleyn
8:30 am
May 19, 2010
I’ll consider the discussion questions when I’m not in work, but I personally loved this book.
It ‘humanises’ (if that is the right word) Cromwell and made me empathise with him – the Cromwell character in the novel is dry, witty, thorough, and generous to his family and friends. I got the feeling, throughout the novel, that there was no limit to what he could achieve, absolutely nothing that could not be done once he turned his hand to it.
I also loved the Wolsey character in the book – he seems a little bit mischievous in his own way – the part about him summoning an evil spirit to follow Norfolk around had me laughing out loud – and Cromwell’s imagined response to it.
It’s interesting I found, that in real life, Cromwell is somewhat disliked while Thomas More is a saint, whereas this novel almost switches them completely – More is really unlikeable here.
The depiction of Anne I thought was interesting. There is plenty of negative description, but our quick-witted, clever Anne is there too.
~ Team Anne ~
4:22 pm
September 8, 2010
This was such a brilliant book on so many levels.
Just a few highlights that come to mind:
Thomas Cromwell’s deep love for his son. Throughout the book there were references that Gregory was different from his father, did not have an aptitude for “affairs”, and that he was a more gentler soul. I’m wondering if in the sequel to Wolf Hall, Hilary Mantel will reveal some dark secrets of Cromwell….he definitely strikes me as a person that feels the end justifies the means and he will to do whatever it takes to get the job done.
The book spends a lot of time on the “Maid of Kent”. Again Cromwell states he ensured she was never really mistreated yet he also wonders if she will still be alive in time for her execution. I do wonder if there was a reason why Mantel devoted so much time to this character, perhaps it shows the crossroads of English society between superstition and modern reasoning.
I am also a bit puzzled why Cromwell acted like such a silly, willy towards both Mary Bolyen and Jane Seymour. I can understand any man being intrigued with Mary, she was obviously physically attractive and charming enough to be a mistress of two kings. Yet he also went all googly eyed over Jane Seymour too…what is up with that?? I thought he would be more rationale minded.
Finally there is the running joke throughout the book about Yorkshire and what a backward place of ill-repute it was. I’m not sure I get this joke, and would like if other readers would like to comment on this.
thanks for listening.. Jaye
11:53 am
February 24, 2010
Cromwell was human after all, and he even had a sense of humor. I found myself laughing out loud at some of his remarks. Wolsey, too. Who knew?
I found him to be a loving family man. A man who could take an insult and still persevere. When Norfolk calls him a “”person,” Cromwell seemed to take it in stride. Norfolk was totally calling him common and reaching too high above his place. I found it very insulting.
I found it difficult to like any of the characters. I didn’t even like Anne. She was mean and nasty. When she wasn’t being a complete bitch, she was depressed. Mary coming on to Cromwell was distasteful. I was very happy when she finally met Stafford and that whole thing with Cromwell was over. Was that to prove that she would try to bed everyone at court? Did not like it.
Dear sweet Jane…Could he want her for himself? Nothing but praise from him for her. At first he tried to get permission for his son to marry Jane. Later, he wants her for himself. He was mapping out the Progress at the end and decided to take that detour to Wolf Hall. It was going to be a pleasant detour for him. He was going to see Jane. What a surprise he has coming. Although I have to say, I think they would have been perfect for each other.
Cromwell is loyal to his bosses. He was loyal to Wolsey, and I think he loved him like a Father. Wolsey taught him the ins and outs of court life. Cromwell was groomed by Wolsey to take his place at the king’s side.
Some people turn out to be abusers just like the parent who abused them. Not Cromwell. He was a good Father, and family man. He made sure of it. I liked that about him.
Once he started working for the King his loyalty was given to Henry, and only to him. Everything he learned about the people at court he filed away for future use. Every little innocuous thing that was said about someone, was remembered by Cromwell.
Cromwell disliked Thomas More a great deal. However, he did try a few times to get More to sign the paper that would spare his life, but More had already decided he was going to martyr himself.
I did enjoy the book and I am looking forward to the sequel.
6:05 pm
August 2, 2010
I liked the book a lot as well. The Cromwell in this book was different than the character I’d known before (i.e. an unfeeling, worm-like lawyer hovering and listening at keyholes) and I actually liked him. I agree about Anne: I was slightly angry that she was portrayed so awfully. One quote I seem to remember vividly: “she was a calculating being, with a slick cold brain behind her hungry black eyes.” I belive it’s that exactly with maybe a wrong word or two, but anyway it upset me, being such a fan of Anne! That being said, I understand why Hilary Mantel made her such.
At the very beginning I was slightly unsure because I thought the book seemed a bit dry, but after the first few chapters my opinion quickly got better! By the middle I was completely hooked. I don’t have much time here, I wish I had more, but I want to answer this one question from Claire (by the way, thanks for the questions!! They really got me thinking!):
"Grumble all you like, this is how it's going to be"
10:35 am
February 24, 2010
Alyssa, you said you understood why Mantel made Anne the way she was in the book. Could you explain that a little, because I did not get it? But I’ll try.
I agree with you about Cromwell’s seeing the woman burned at the stake. I think it affected and shaped his future choice of the Reformation and his opposition to the Catholic Church. I do believe he was driven by his convictions of common decency and personal loyalty rather than a specific religious conviction.
10:11 am
August 2, 2010
Well, I was upset too how Anne was portrayed, but I don't think the Cromwell that was portrayed in the book would have helped Henry with Anne's framing, etc. if he thought she was a wonderful person. Also, the title of the book is Wolf Hall, really, the home of Jane Seymour.
I especially thought the way the Nun of Kent was portrayed was quite interesting, and I loved the way Mantel made Cromwell's character.
"Grumble all you like, this is how it's going to be"
9:08 am
February 24, 2010
I see your point. I think the Cromwell in this book would have done whatever his King wanted him to do against anyone whether Cromwell liked them or not. I don't think this Cromwell allowed himself to like too many people at court. If he had gotten too close, he would have found himself in a difficult position having to be rid of them for his King. That must be why I couldn't get close to any of the characters other than Cromwell. I was seeing the court through Cromwell's eyes. I agree with you, I really enjoyed Cromwell in this book.
I think that Anne was portrayed the way she was because we were seeing the various characters through Cromwell's eyes, which also meant that we were getting his take on events.
I actually found it really hard to get into the book. I'm not sure whether it was because I had just been reading C J Sansom's books, which are real page-turners, but I found Wolf Hall quite dry and had to actually force myself to keep reading which is very unlike me because I'm a complete bookworm. I did like the way that she depicted Cromwell though, it was good to empathise with him.
Debunking the myths about Anne Boleyn
4:37 pm
August 2, 2010
Claire,
I definitely see what you mean. I said earlier that at first I found it a bit dry, and that was a kind way of putting it because I said “a few chapters” and it really took me about one-third of the book to get interested! But after that my liking for it mounted, although I admit that I started another book about halfway through and read it on the side, so it took me even longer than it usually would to get through it. That being said, I think that Hilary Mantel is a fantastic writer: I can definitely see why she won the Man Booker Award, because though you could argue Wolf Hall isn't the best page turner, it's very meaningful and a great piece of (dryer than I would prefer) literature.
"Grumble all you like, this is how it's going to be"
10:23 am
November 18, 2010
Jaye said:
Finally there is the running joke throughout the book about Yorkshire and what a backward place of ill-repute it was. I'm not sure I get this joke, and would like if other readers would like to comment on this.
thanks for listening.. Jaye
At that time Yorkshire was several days journey into a much wilder country. This would give the impression that the people were behind the times with news, gossip and fashions. Sadly this attitude was still prevalent in the 1980's when I moved from the North-East to London.
Plus, it could play into the impression that the former Yorkists kings were licentious and worth being replaced by the Tudor dynasty.
It's always bunnies.
12:04 pm
February 24, 2010
Hi Anyanka and welcome. Love your signature.
This is a bit off topic, but it is in reference to the north country. I had no idea what the reference to Yorkshire meant in the book either. I was listening to an entertainment broadcast yesterday and they were talking about a movie that is being released soon called “Made In Dagenham.” It is a dramatization of the 1968 strike at the Ford Dagenham car plant, where female workers walked out in protest against sexual discrimination. They wanted equal pay. Looks like an excellent movie.The girl who was reviewing the film said the woman who started the strike had two things going against her. (1) She was female. (2) She was from northern England. In other words they thought she wasn't very bright. (the reviewer's words, not mine)
It reminded me of the remarks I'd read in “Wolf Hall.” So, thank you for the explanation.
Oooh, you'be brought up the whole North/South divide! Traditionally, there is a joke that you're a Northerner if you were born anywhere north of the Watford Gap which is near Daventry in Northamptonshire (in the Midlands). Some rather insular southerners believe that there is nowhere else of importance outside of London and that may have been the same in Tudor times. Not so long ago, you could only be a BBC newsreader/TV presenter if you spoke the “Queen's English” in a posh southern way, northern accents were definitely looked down upon but these days there are all sorts of accents on TV.
I'm a Northerner by birth (born in Lancashire), half Welsh and half English, and a Midlander by upbringing (Warwickshire), although the Midlands is seen as the North by most Southerners. I have lived in both the Midlands and the South and here are the differences I have noticed and when I say South I mean South-East, commuter land for London:-
- People seem to get friendlier and more trusting the further North you go – I love being called “love” or “ducky” by shop assistants “oop north” and being thanked with a wave when I give way when driving rather than being ignored.
- The Southern fish and chip shops don't sell curry sauce, mushy peas or gravy – I couldn't cope with that!
- The South is a bit of a rat-race, everyone is stressed and in a real hurry
- There are too many cars and too many people in the South
- My husband, Tim, a Southerner, says “it always rains up North”!
- The very different accents and sayings/dialects
Obviously there are exceptions to this and these are rather sweeping statements but you get the idea! There are still differences and stereotypes between “ooop North” and “dan saf”.
For those of you in the USA who might not have heard some of the diverse accents we have in the UK, Tim has put some together at http://speedy.theanneboleynfil…..uthern.mp3 and this is the order:-
Black Country – Midlands.
London Posh – South. Interview with actor Nigel Havers.
Newcastle – North, the Geordie accent.
Essex – South but not posh! This is Stacey Solomon, star of the X Factor and I'm a Celebrity Get Me Out of Here. She is from Dagenham in Essex.
Debunking the myths about Anne Boleyn
5:44 am
November 18, 2010
11:56 am
February 24, 2010
7:04 pm
August 2, 2010
Yep, I would agree, Sharon! Except maybe with the whole Southern Belle, traditional Southern thing, as well as th stereotype that Southerners are nicer and more friendly (think less honking…).
Sorry to bring us back to Wolf Hall (we've very successfully veered off topic and I'm glad, I like the whole North-South thing!) but just a quick question: What would everyone rate Wolf Hall? Did you, or did you not, like it overall?
"Grumble all you like, this is how it's going to be"
10:56 am
February 24, 2010
On a scale of 1-10 I'd say an 8+, almost a 9. (like how I pinned that down?…LOL) I, too, had trouble getting into it. It was a bit dry. As I said before, I really did not like any of the characters except him, but I believe that was the point. It actually changed the rather low opinion of him which I had held before reading the book. He was a remarkable lawyer, loyal to his king, and a loving family man.
4:36 pm
August 2, 2010
I would probably say 8 (similar to yours haha). It would have been an 8 1/2 or 9 but it was dry, you're right, it took me a while getting into it, and I wasn't so keen on the portrayal of Anne. But yes, great book, and deserving of the prize it got.
"Grumble all you like, this is how it's going to be"