4:31 pm
June 23, 2011
… Im another *kiwi* and very new to The AB Files.
Ive always had a keen curiousity in history and my favourite read is a historical biography. Its this love that brought me here after reading *The Lady in the Tower.* I must admit to only having known *popular *propaganda* about Anne Boleyn up to the point of reading TLITT. This book piqued my curiosity and I came on line to learn more about Anne. The more I read the more questions I have!
My opinion of Anne which was based only in crude knowledge as I said is shifting as I learn more about the woman and the times in which she lived. Im beginning to realise her courtship by Henry, her marriage, her downfall, was much more complex than is known by the general public.
I have a few questions if someone would be so kind as to answer them …
Did Jane Boleyn testify against Anne or George or any of the others accused?
Was Jane interviewed by Cromwell or by anyone else?
Did anyone testfy against Ann or George or the others accused?
Was Ann or George or the others accused interviewed by Cromwell or anyone else?
Thanks and cheers and lovely to be here.
TLH
6:05 pm
August 12, 2009
TheLadyHelen said:
I have a few questions if someone would be so kind as to answer them …
Did Jane Boleyn testify against Anne or George or any of the others accused?
Was Jane interviewed by Cromwell or by anyone else?
Did anyone testify against Anne or George or the others accused?
Was Anne or George or the others accused interviewed by Cromwell or anyone else?
I'm somewhat ashamed that I don't know all these without looking them up (which I will do, but in the meantime…)
No.
I'm sure everyone in the Queen's household was questioned, but we don't know for sure who said what.
No.
I don't know for sure, but I do know they weren't informed of the charges against them until their trials. At that point, the charges were read out and they had to answer the charges immediately.
Here is a nice article on Jane, Lady Rochford:
/jane-boleyn-the-infamous-lady-rochford-guest-post/10020/
"Don't knock at death's door.
Ring the bell and run. He hates that."
6:22 pm
November 18, 2010
3:46 am
November 23, 2010
Welcome Lady Helen
Glad to see another new member of the AB Files, looking forward to hearing/seeing more of you
Why not join my page on Facebook – Tudor Dynasty
http://www.facebook.com/pages/.....9213293551
4:58 am
June 7, 2010
9:04 am
February 24, 2010
8:48 pm
January 9, 2010
12:25 am
January 17, 2011
TheLadyHelen said:
I have a few questions if someone would be so kind as to answer them …
Did Jane Boleyn testify against Anne or George or any of the others accused?
Was Jane interviewed by Cromwell or by anyone else?
Did anyone testfy against Ann or George or the others accused?
Was Ann or George or the others accused interviewed by Cromwell or anyone else?
Thanks and cheers and lovely to be here.
TLH
Hi and welcome to The AB Files! 🙂
Here are the answers to your questions:-
1)We know that Jane was interrogated but there is no record of anyone giving evidence at the trial and the woman whose testimony the case rested on is not named.
2)She was interrgogated by Cromwell
3)As I said there is no record of any witnesses being involved in the court cases.
4)George and Anne were taken to the Tower without being interrogated. Smeaton was interrogated, and perhaps tortured, at Cromwell's house in Stepney, Norris was interrogated by the King and I'm not sure who interrogated Weston and Brereton, if they were interrogated, I assume Cromwell. Cromwell was very much the man in charge of the case against Anne and the men.
Hope that helps.
Debunking the myths about Anne Boleyn
6:38 pm
June 23, 2011
Thank you, Claire and everyone!
Yes, those answers help.
Its so obvious Anne was *murdered* even tho her execution was *legal* in those times. IF there was ANY truth to the charges against her one might be able at a pinch to swallow her punishment but there appears to be no truth. It appears the charges were jacked up and so stupid as to look innane. She was by that time so out of favour there was no one with enough power to champion her. Not even a legal system that would ensure her a fair trial.
One things for sure, what woman in her right mind would want to step into Annes shoes? I wonder if Jane Seymore was machinated into marriage to Henry by her family? Was Jane more scared of what her family would do to her if she didnt marry Henry than what Henry would do to her if she did marry him?!! No other reason makes much sense to me when Jane knows her predecessor has just died unjustfully in a gruesome manner!!
Thanks again for the lovely welcome to the site.
TLH